Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Adenotonsillectomy is the first-line treatment for pediatric obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Intracapsular tonsillectomy (ICT) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to traditional extracapsular tonsillectomy (ECT), with potential advantages in reducing postoperative morbidity. Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes, postoperative morbidity, and efficacy of ICT versus ECT in children with OSA. Methods: This prospective comparative study included 100 children aged 6–10 years, divided into two groups: ICT ( n =50) and ECT ( n =50). All patients underwent standardized surgical procedures and were followed for 1 year. Outcome measures included postoperative pain scores, time to recovery, haemorrhage rates, and improvement in OSA severity assessed by Apnoea–Hypopnoea Index (AHI). Statistical analysis was performed using independent t-test, Chi-square test, and repeated measures ANOVA, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Results: ICT demonstrated significantly lower postoperative pain (Day 1: 4.2 ± 1.1 vs 7.1 ± 1.3; P < 0.001) and faster recovery, including earlier return to normal diet (3.2 ± 1.1 vs 6.5 ± 1.4 days; P < 0.001). Secondary haemorrhage was significantly lower in ICT (2% vs 12%; P = 0.049). Both groups showed comparable improvement in OSA, with no significant difference in postoperative AHI (1.9 ± 0.8 vs 1.6 ± 0.7; P = 0.089). Tonsillar tissue reappearance was observed in 6% of ICT patients without significant clinical recurrence. Conclusion: ICT provides equivalent efficacy with significantly reduced postoperative morbidity compared to ECT, supporting its use as a preferred surgical technique in pediatric OSA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: