This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: Inadequate patient information about gout may contribute to poor disease outcomes. We reviewed existing educational resources for gout to identify strengths and weaknesses and compare resources cross-nationally. METHODS: Content, readability, and dietary recommendations were reviewed using a sample of 30 resources (print and Web-based) from 6 countries. RESULTS: More than half of the resources were written at a highly complex level. Some content areas were lacking coverage, including comorbidity risks, uric acid target levels, and continuing allopurinol during acute attacks. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest significant room for improvement in gout patient educational resources, particularly regarding self-management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnston et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: