Key result
Bivalirudin fails to reduce new cerebral emboli on MRI vs unfractionated heparin during TAVR.
Why the study?
Cerebral embolization is a frequent complication after TAVR, and it was uncertain whether anticoagulation with bivalirudin reduces cerebral embolization compared to heparin.
RCT (n=60)
Open-label
randomized
Yes
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Brain imaging changes being reported do not necessarily translate into clinical strokes, but many of us worry that with every loss of brain cells, some subclinical degradation of cognitive, behavior, motor, or other important brain functions occurs.”
Randomized trial finds similar cerebral embolism rates with bivalirudin versus heparin during aortic valve replacement, indicating procedural anticoagulation choice does not alter embolic risk.
BACKGROUND: Cerebral embolization is a frequent complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We hypothesized that cerebral embolization may be reduced by anticoagulation with bivalirudin during TAVR. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the proportion of patients with new cerebral embolus after TAVR and to investigate whether parenteral procedural anticoagulation strategies affect cerebral embolization. METHODS: The BRAVO (Effect of Bivalirudin on Aortic Valve Intervention Outcomes)-3 randomized trial compared bivalirudin with unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. A prospective cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) substudy was conducted in 4 sites; 60 patients were imaged with brain MRI after TAVR. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients with new cerebral emboli on MRI. Secondary endpoints included quantitative MRI analyses of cerebral lesions and neurological outcomes at 48 h and 30 days. RESULTS: Patients were randomized to bivalirudin (n = 29) versus heparin (n = 31). The proportion of patients with new cerebral emboli on MRI did not differ between bivalirudin and heparin groups (65.5% vs. 58.1%; p = 0.55). Groups were similar for median number of emboli per patient (1 [interquartile range (IQR): 0 to 3] vs. 1 [IQR: 0 to 1]; p = 0.08), total volume of emboli (45 [IQR: 0 to 175] mm(3) vs. 33 [IQR: 0 to 133] mm(3); p = 0.86), or proportion of patients with a clinical neurological deficit at 48 h or 30 days. All patients who presented clinically with stroke had evidence of new emboli on MRI. CONCLUSIONS: This study documented cerebral embolization in nearly two-thirds of patients during contemporary TAVR. There were no significant differences in cerebral embolization for bivalirudin versus heparin anticoagulation during TAVR. (Open-Label, Randomized Trial in Patients Undergoing TAVR to Determine Safety and Efficacy of Bivalrudin vs. UFH [BRAVO-2/3]; NCT01651780).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belle et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) (n=60). Bivalirudin vs. Unfractionated heparin was evaluated on proportion of patients with new cerebral emboli on MRI (p=0.55). Bivalirudin did not significantly reduce the proportion of patients with new cerebral emboli on MRI compared to unfractionated heparin during TAVR (65.5% vs. 58.1%; p=0.55).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: