Key result
Acipimox matches fenofibrate for atherogenic lipid control but selectively lowers Lp(a) levels.
Why the study?
The comparative effects of fenofibrate and acipimox on lipoprotein subclasses distribution in Chinese patients with T2DM and hypertriglyceridemia were not established.
Does fenofibrate compared to acipimox improve lipoprotein subclasses distribution in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertriglyceridemia?
RCT (n=66)
Randomized
Does fenofibrate compared to acipimox improve lipoprotein subclasses distribution in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertriglyceridemia?
Fenofibrate and acipimox are comparably effective in modifying atherogenic lipid profiles in T2DM patients with hypertriglyceridemia, though acipimox has the added benefit of reducing Lipoprotein(a).
Comparable lipid modification supports either agent in T2DM hypertriglyceridemia; acipimox's Lp(a) reduction extends options for further outcome trials.
Aim: To compare the effects of fenofibrate and acipimox on lipoprotein subclasses distribution in the Chinese population with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertriglyceridemia. Patients & methods: Sixty-six patients were recruited for the 2-month study, and were divided randomly into a micronized fenofibrate group (160 mg/day; n = 33) and an acipimox group (500 mg/day; n = 33), respectively. HDL subclasses were measured by 2D gradient gel electrophoresis coupled with immunoblotting; LDL subclasses were measured by 1D gradient gel electrophoresis. Results: Compared with baseline, both fenofibrate and acipimox increased HDL2b, whereas HDL3a, small, dense LDL and oxidized LDL decreased significantly. Lipoprotein(a) significantly decreased in acipimox but not the fenfibrate group. No difference was found between these two groups on the changes of lipoprotein subclasses. Conclusion: Fenofibrate and acipimox therapy were comparably effective in modifying atherogenic lipids profile, and contributed to metabolism of HDL subclasses maturation in the Chinese population with T2DM and hypertriglyceridemia. Meanwhile, the acipimox intensively decreased lipoprotein(a) levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertriglyceridemia (n=66). Micronized fenofibrate vs. Acipimox (500 mg/day) was evaluated on Changes in lipoprotein subclasses distribution. Micronized fenofibrate and acipimox were comparably effective in modifying atherogenic lipid profiles, though acipimox significantly decreased lipoprotein(a) levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: