This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Optimal dosing of antibiotics in critically ill patients treated with the novel multi organ replacement therapy ADVOS (ADVanced Organ Support) based on albumin dialysis is unclear. This study aims to provide real life data on meropenem plasma concentrations after prolonged infusion in patients treated with ADVOS and a critically ill control group with and without continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed plasma concentrations of meropenem obtained as part of our standard of care therapeutic drug monitoring in the intensive care unit. Meropenem was administered as a prolonged infusion over 3 h. We measured peak and trough levels, pre-and post-filter levels of meropenem using high performance liquid chromatography. We calculated the meropenem clearance and compared the measured clearance with predicted clearance based on creatinine, calculated by the MeroEasy tool. RESULTS: In total, 159 measurements across 16 patients were analyzed. Meropenem trough concentrations were highest in the CVVHDF group with a median of 23.5 mg/L, followed by the ADVOS (median 9.3 mg/L) and control group (median 7.6 mg/L). No trough levels were below the lower limit of 2 mg/L in the CVVHDF and ADVOS groups. Meropenem machine clearance by CVVHDF was calculated to be 1.8 (± 0.5) L/h and 3.5 (± 1) L/h for ADVOS. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that ADVOS treatment in critically ill patients receiving a high dose meropenem regimen (2 g IV q8h) does not lead to underdosing. Some trough values were even within potentially toxic levels, especially in the CVVHDF group, highlighting the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Totschnig et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: