Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Controlled, blinded studies of sex-hormone replacement in postmenopausal women using natural estradiol (E2) and native progesterone (P) are few. To delineate the effect of E2 alone or with P on lipids and inflammatory markers. A placebo-controlled, double-masked, prospectively randomized study of 40 healthy, postmenopausal volunteers assigned to four treatment groups: placebo, intramuscular E2, and/or micronized oral P for 23 (±2) days. Treatment with E2 alone compared with placebo lowered total cholesterol (TC; P = 0.006), non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (nonHDL-C; P = 0.004), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; P = 0.012), and apolipoprotein B (Apo B; P = 0.02) levels, and raised HDL-C levels (P = 0.03 vs the 3 other groups). Conversely, addition of P to E2 reduced HDL-C levels (P = 0.015). Triglyceride concentrations manifested no effect on E2 or P. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level was highest in women with E2 and P replacement (P = 0.018 vs placebo). Leptin and IL-6 concentrations did not vary. P treatment decreased adiponectin levels (P = 0.019). Serum E2 levels correlated linearly with TC, LDL-C, nonHDL-C, Apo B (all negatively), and SHBG (positively) concentrations. P level correlated negatively with TC (P = 0.029), HDL-C (P = 0.002), and adiponectin (P = 0.002) levels. In this study, there were individual and interactive effects of E2 and P on key lipids in postmenopausal individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roelfsema et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: