We consider the problem of designing low-redundancy codes in settings where one must correct deletions in conjunction with substitutions or adjacent transpositions; a combination of errors that is usually observed in DNA-based data storage. One of the most basic versions of this problem was settled more than 50 years ago by Levenshtein, who proved that binary Varshamov-Tenengolts codes correct one arbitrary edit error, i.e., one deletion or one substitution, with nearly optimal redundancy. However, this approach fails to extend to many simple and natural variations of the binary single-edit error setting. In this work, we make progress on the code design problem above in three such variations: 1) We construct linear-time encodable and decodable length-nnon-binary codes correcting a single edit error with nearly optimal redundancylog n+O(log log n), providing an alternative simpler proof of a result by Cai et al. (IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021). This is achieved by employing what we call weighted VT sketches, a new notion that may be of independent interest. 2) We show the existence of a binary code correcting one deletion or one adjacent transposition with nearly optimal redundancylog n+O(log log n). 3) We construct linear-time encodable and list-decodable binary codes with list-size 2 for one deletion and one substitution with redundancy4log n+O(log log n). This matches the Gilbert-Varshamov existential bound up to anO(log log n)additive term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabrys et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: