Key result
High left atrial low-voltage burden is linked to ~127% higher AF recurrence after PVI.
Why the study?
The extent of left atrial fibrosis has been associated with atrial fibrillation burden and outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation, but the value of automated scar quantification for predicting success was unclear.
Does automated scar quantification of left atrial diseased tissue burden predict recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=109)
Does automated scar quantification of left atrial diseased tissue burden predict recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Odds Ratio: 2.27
p-value: p=0.022
Automated quantification of left atrial low voltage areas during 3D mapping prior to PVI can predict the risk of AF recurrence, with high burden indicating higher risk.
Automated LA scar quantification may predict PVI success; leaves open prospective validation before guiding ablation decisions.
Background. The burden and persistence of atrial fibrillation (AF) have been associated with the presence and extent of left atrial (LA) fibrosis. Recent reports have implicated an association between the extent of LA fibrosis and the outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We aimed to analyse the value of an automated scar quantification method in the prediction of success following PVI. Methods. One hundred and nine consecutive patients undergoing PVI for paroxysmal or persistent AF were included in our observational study with a 2-year follow-up. Prior to PVI, patients underwent high-definition LA electroanatomical mapping, and scar burden was quantified by automated software (Voltage Histogram Analysis, CARTO 3, Biosense Webster), then classified into 4 subgroups (Dublin Classes I-IV). Recurrence rates were analysed on and off antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD), respectively. Results. The overall success rate was 74% and 67% off AAD at 1- and 2-year follow-up, respectively. Patients with Dublin Class IV had significantly lower success rates ( p = 0.008 , off AAD). Dublin Class IV ( OR = 2.27 , p = 0.022 , off AAD) and the presence of arrhythmia in the blanking period ( OR = 3.28 , p = 0.001 , off AAD) were the only significant predictors of recurrence. The use of AAD did not affect these results. Conclusions. We propose a classification of low voltage areas based on automated quantification by software during 3D mapping prior to PVI. Patients with high burden of low voltage areas (>31% of <0.5 mV, Dublin Class IV) have a higher risk of recurrence following PVI. Information gathered during electroanatomical mapping may have important prognostic value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herczeg et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=109). High burden of low voltage areas (Dublin Class IV) vs. Lower burden of low voltage areas (Dublin Classes I-III) was evaluated on Recurrence of atrial fibrillation (OR 2.27, p=0.022). A high burden of left atrial low voltage areas (>31% of <0.5 mV, Dublin Class IV) significantly predicted recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation (OR 2.27, p=0.022).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: