High-speed in-line (up to 1 m s −1 ) Non-Destructive Testing requires measurement systems whose uncertainty is traceable under realistic operating conditions. In this study, the uncertainty of a directional Eddy Current Testing (ECT) sensor is quantified in accordance with Verband der Automobilindustrie (VDA) 5.1 for two defect-severity metrics: voltage-based and phase-based signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Ten inspection speeds (0.1–1.0 m s −1 ) were investigated with ten repeated scans per speed, enabling an ANOVA-based decomposition of Type A components and a systematic evaluation of Type B contributions. Both channels exhibited a statistically significant speed dependence of comparable magnitude (between-speed (speed-effect) variance component uAV≈ 1.43 –1.44 SNR units), while voltage-based SNR retained the lower repeatability uncertainty ( uEV=1.03 versus 1.41 SNR units for phase). Combining Type A and Type B components yields expanded uncertainties of UMP= 3.5155 (voltage) and UMP= 4.0364 (phase), corresponding to minimum permissible tolerances of 7.0311 and 8.0729 SNR units, respectively. These results demonstrate that voltage-based SNR provides the most metrologically robust characteristic for downstream machine-learning analysis and establish a traceable VDA 5.1 framework for uncertainty quantification in high-speed EC inspections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meirbek Mussatayev (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: