This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes among children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who did or did not have documented telehealth (TH) utilization. METHODS: code F84.0) were assigned to a TH or non-TH cohort. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) across 14 comorbid condition categories, the analysis included 12,380 patients per cohort at 6 months and 15,689 patients per cohort at 12 months. Eight outcomes were assessed: medical noncompliance, antipsychotic initiation, emergency department (ED) visit, inpatient hospitalization, antidepressant initiation, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication initiation, irritability-related encounters, and adaptive behavior treatment. Risk ratios (RRs), hazard ratios, and encounter frequencies were derived. RESULTS: PSM cohorts were well balanced. In the 6-month analysis, TH use was associated with lower antipsychotic initiation (RR=0.81) and hospitalization (RR=0.69) but more ED visits (RR=1.39), irritability-related encounters (RR=2.49), and adaptive behavior treatment (RR=5.17). In the 12-month analysis, higher irritability (RR=2.29) and adaptive behavior treatment (RR=3.40) persisted in the TH cohort, which also had increased antidepressant (RR=1.17) and ADHD medication initiation (RR=1.12) and greater medical noncompliance (RR=1.84). CONCLUSIONS: TH use by young people with ASD was associated with lower rates of hospitalization and antipsychotic initiation at 6 months, although not at 12 months. TH use was also associated with increased irritability-related encounters and adaptive behavior treatment. These findings highlight the need for tailored hybrid care strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: