Objectives: This pilot study primarily evaluated the feasibility of study procedures, intervention delivery, adherence, safety, tolerability, and acceptability of adjunctive FreeFlex ™ Emulgel in children with symptomatic hemophilic knee arthropathy. Exploratory within-subject changes in knee-specific Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), faces pain scale–revised (FPS-R), and Pediatric Haemophilia Activities List (PedHAL) were assessed to estimate treatment effects and inform the design of a future randomized controlled trial (RCT). Material and Methods: This prospective, open-label, single-arm pilot study enrolled ten male children with hemophilia A or B and symptomatic knee arthropathy. Participants applied FreeFlex ™ Emulgel twice daily for 4 weeks alongside routine care. Feasibility outcomes included intervention adherence, treatment acceptability, patient and caregiver satisfaction, and safety. Exploratory clinical outcomes included knee-specific HJHS, pain intensity measured using the FPS-R, and functional ability assessed by the PedHAL. Results: All enrolled participants completed the 4-week study with no treatment-related adverse events, supporting the feasibility and tolerability of the intervention. Patient and caregiver satisfaction was reported by 60% and 70%, respectively. All predefined progression criteria for a future RCT were met, including retention, adherence, completion of study assessments, safety, and acceptability. Exploratory analyses demonstrated improvements in mean left knee HJHS (10.0 ± 2.21 to 8.8 ± 2.66; p = 0.023) and total knee HJHS (19.0 ± 3.59–17.4 ± 4.47; p = 0.048). Mean FPS-R scores decreased by 20%, and PedHAL scores showed numerical improvements, although these changes were not statistically significant. Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrated that adjunctive use of FreeFlex ™ Emulgel was feasible, safe, well tolerated, and acceptable in children with hemophilic knee arthropathy over 4 weeks. Exploratory improvements in joint health and patient-reported outcomes support the feasibility of conducting adequately powered RCTs to further evaluate clinical efficacy and establish treatment benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narayan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: