Accurate module-temperature estimation supports assessment of rooftop photovoltaic (PV) systems, but minute-scale meteorological fluctuations and thermal memory challenge steady-state models. This study used 44,638 synchronized one-minute records from a rooftop PV platform in Chongqing, China, during August 2025. The representative backsheet temperature was the arithmetic mean of five simultaneously valid sensors. Physical, static XGBoost, and thermal-history-aware XGBoost models were compared. Lagged values, strictly prior rolling means, and increments were constructed uniformly for four meteorological variables at 5, 10, and 20 min windows. Three expanding-time validation folds and a one-standard-error parsimony rule selected eight features: four current variables and their strictly prior 10 min means. During the retrospective 27–31 August held-out comparison, the dynamic-model MAE was slightly higher than the static-model MAE (1.088 versus 1.081 °C). RMSE decreased from 1.757 to 1.437 °C and P95AE from 3.907 to 3.049 °C. Paired day-level bootstrap intervals supported the observed tail-error reduction more clearly than the RMSE difference within this five-day record. MAE was about 40% lower during severe ambient heat and 45% lower during rapid irradiance decrease but increased at night. Daily peaks were underestimated by 2.574 °C on average; absolute peak-timing error had a mean of 26.8 min and a median of 1 min. The findings support site-specific thermal-history features for estimating the monitored-point mean, not a universal thermal timescale or uncalibrated safety-related peak thresholding. Prior inspection of the comparison dates, limited temporal coverage, and absent external validation restrict transferability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: