This work investigates the impact of the deposition environment on laser-substrate-powder interactions during Laser-Directed Energy Deposition ( L -DED) of IN718, correlating powder characteristics and thermal history with bead quality and mechanical behaviour. Five gas environments were investigated by varying the centring, shaping and carrier gas compositions (all-Ar, all-N 2 , centre-N 2 , shape-N 2 and carrier-N 2 ). Using N 2 as centring gas minimized the Ar plasma plume, improving laser energy transfer to meltpool and increasing dilution, while bead width remained constant (∼1.6 mm) across conditions. Owing to its superior thermal conductivity, N 2 environments produced faster cooling rates, suppressing Laves phase formation (∼3 vol% in all-Ar vs. an overall range of 2–3 vol%) and promoting finer grain size. The gas flow configuration also affected ricocheted powder characteristics: N 2 as carrier gas minimized particle size deviation and satellite coarsening (∼57% smaller satellites) relative to as-received powder, whereas N 2 as centring gas promoted coarser satellites and broader size distributions. XPS analysis revealed Al-nitrides and Ti-oxides on ricocheted powder surface under all conditions, with all-N 2 showing the highest Ti-nitride (12.2% vs. 3.1–4.0% for other conditions) and AlN (59.2% vs. 17.3% for all-Ar) fractions. Multi-wall depositions confirmed superior build quality under N 2 , with lower porosity, higher ultimate tensile strength (∼840 MPa) and elongation (∼37%) than all-Ar (∼730 MPa, ∼22%), despite comparable hardness across conditions. These findings highlight the importance of selecting suitable deposition environment to minimize defects, powder degradation and cost rather than relying solely on inert gases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: