A second counterexample to Singer's conjecture on the algebraic transfer

In this paper, we provide a second explicit counterexample to Singer's injectivity conjecture for the sixth algebraic transfer in bidegree $(6,46).$ This result corrects one of the main theorems in our recent preprint [Theorem 2.5]{Phuc}. Exact computation gives a two-dimensional transfer domain and a two-dimensional target, so a comparison of dimensions alone is inconclusive. We construct Steenrod-annihilated divided-power polynomials U and V, identify the normalized dual coinvariant basis as $[U+V]$ and $[V]$, and exhibit a lambda-algebra element B satisfying ψ₆(U+V)=δ B. A nonzero invariant pairing proves that [U+V]≠0. The other basis element maps to h₀h₃p₀, and a complete boundary-space calculation excludes h₅Ph₁ from the image. Thus the transfer has one-dimensional kernel, image, and cokernel. We specify the finite matrices and verification procedures, and print every coefficient of the primitives, invariants, boundary, and separating functional in the appendices.