The estimation of per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) linear soil–water partition coefficients ( K d values) is a key step in quantifying PFAS leaching from unsaturated soils. However, approaches for determining desorption K d values for PFAS have received little attention. Herein we focus on perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and consider the conventional approach of using the organic carbon‐normalized desorption coefficient ( K OC ) multiplied by the fraction of soil organic carbon ( f OC ) for estimating K d . Results based on soil desorption data from several studies showed that K OC values for PFOS spanned nearly two orders of magnitude, with a mean of 1600 L/kg and a standard deviation of 1600 L/kg. These K OC values showed no significant trend with soil f OC values for the range of f OC values (0.0007 to 0.047) in the compiled studies. Desorption equilibration times in excess of 24 h were observed in multiple studies, for which a 24‐h incubation period would have resulted in substantial (up to a factor of two) overestimation of PFOS desorption K OC values. Finally, comparison of K OC values derived based on a single desorption point (i.e., K OC is based on a single liquid: solid ratio) were up to an order‐of‐magnitude greater than K OC values based on the linear slope of a desorption isotherm (i.e., multiple desorption points from use of multiple liquid: solid ratios). This was due to hysteretic desorption behavior, where a fraction of the PFOS was not readily desorbed and the desorption isotherms exhibited positive nonzero intercepts. Such hysteresis indicates that adsorption K OC or K d values may be a poor indicator for desorption behavior for some soils. Together, these results suggest that caution should be used when relying on simple K OC ‐based approaches for estimating the K d value for PFOS, and single‐point desorption/leaching tests should consider the potential for slow (more than 24 h) and hysteretic desorption processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schaefer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: