This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Automated fruit classification plays a central role in post-harvest quality assessment, particularly in reducing dependence on manual inspection within smart agriculture systems. In this work, a deep learning framework, MSA-TNet, is introduced to address jujube fruit classification across two related tasks, binary bruise detection and multi-class variety recognition. The study uses two publicly available datasets comprising 1,464 original images for bruise detection and 1,716 original images for variety classification, with provider-supplied augmented versions used exclusively to expand the training partitions. The datasets were partitioned at the original-image level before augmentation to avoid leakage from augmented derivatives across subsets. For comparison, six established transfer learning models, including ResNet50, EfficientNet-B0, DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, ConvNeXt-Tiny, and ConvNeXt-Small, were evaluated under consistent experimental settings. Built upon a pretrained ResNet50 backbone, MSA-TNet integrates hierarchical multi-scale feature extraction, channel-wise attention, and feature fusion, introducing a moderate increase in computational complexity. Training is carried out using the AdamW optimizer, and performance is assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. MSA-TNet achieves 99.09% accuracy and macro-F1 for bruise detection and 99.61% accuracy with 99.61% macro-F1 for variety classification. These results indicate competitive performance across the two classification tasks. In terms of computational complexity, MSA-TNet requires 28.4 M parameters and 4.8 GFLOPs, representing a moderate increase over the ResNet50 backbone. The findings demonstrate that integrating hierarchical multi-scale representations with channel-wise attention can provide competitive feature learning performance while maintaining a moderate computational complexity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gulzar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: