We study what one dispersion branch can determine about a two-field quadratic effective theory, and which additional assumptions are required to turn exact reconstruction into a reliable inference from data. In a fixed metric and field normalization, three distinct positive-momentum samples determine the three pole parameters away from an exceptional linear branch. We characterize the complete exceptional family and show how a calibrated response residue resolves it. Exact finite-error identities, including jointly uncertain momentum and frequency, connect this structural result to conditional error certificates. An explicit classical Gaussian heavy-field extension supplies a checkable matching example, while also showing why positivity alone does not bound the displacement of a heavy pole. We then examine published plasmon-polariton data through the separate zero-gradient boundary of the model. The full pilot contains 167 peak positions in five particle-size groups; a subsequent layer-resolved comparison uses five interior points with matched endpoint fitting. Its energy RMSE is 20.89 meV, compared with 25.79 meV for a two-parameter saturation curve, without a statistical significance claim. We derive an exact family under unknown common momentum calibration and certify nominal energy-tolerance floors for four layer groups. An audit of the archived spectra identifies missing uncertainty information and limits on reproducing the original peak extraction. The result is a conditional inverse framework and a reproducible empirical audit, not an independently certified measurement of the unobserved upper gap.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Josip Fellner (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: