Vegetation natural regeneration (VNR) constitutes a prioritized pathway for ecological restoration, yet its spatial implementation is often impeded by landscape-scale stochasticity and environmental heterogeneity. To evaluate the suitability of VNR across the Yellow River Basin (YRB), China, a framework coupling the Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) model with Monte Carlo stochastic simulations was developed at a 1 km resolution. Utilizing multi-temporal land-use data, the Vegetation Natural Regeneration Suitability Index ( S i ) and its prediction uncertainty for the YRB in 2030 were quantified to guide adaptive ecological zoning, and were also analyzed via Geodetector for detecting driving factors. Results showed that the S i of areas with confirmed regeneration ( S i = 0.5775±0.389) exhibited nearly three-fold higher suitability than those with non-regeneration ( S i = 0.1939±0.260). The YRB was classified into three zones according to ( S i ), the low potential zone ( S i =0), medium potential zone (0< S i ≤0.5), and high potential zone (0.5< S i ≤1), which account for 90.45%, 7.11%, and 2.44% of the total area, respectively, with high-potential hotspots (covering 1.58% of the YRB) clustered in middle-reach of the YRB. Spatial differentiation of S i was dominated by vapor pressure deficit, potential evapotranspiration (PET) and mean annual temperature, as well as actual evapotranspiration (AET). with the coupling effect between AET and PET ( q =0.63) exerting the strongest interactive explanatory power. This study provides an approach for quantitatively evaluating suitability of vegetation natural regeneration, and can serve as a decision-support tool for implementing differentiated natural restoration strategies across complex and ecologically fragile basins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: