This paper presents a hybrid rule-constrained and reinforcement learning-assisted Time-to-Boundary (TTB)-guided mobility-control framework with selective Dual Active Protocol Stack (DAPS) activation for energy-efficient QoS-aware handover in dense heterogeneous networks. The proposed one-dimensional (1-D) boundary-crossing model uses predicted boundary arrival time, radio-link condition, handover margin, and queue-risk indicators to suppress unnecessary measurement signaling and activate DAPS or handover only when mobility or QoS risk is detected. The controller combines rule-based feasibility masks, safety overrides, handover confirmation, and post-handover lockout with a lightweight tabular Q-learning policy. The rule-based layer restricts unsafe or infeasible actions, while the RL layer selects among feasible idle, measurement, selective-DAPS, and handover actions according to the current radio, boundary, and queue state. The proposed scheme is evaluated against conventional A3-Time-to-Trigger (A3-TTT), optimized A3-TTT, persistent-DAPS A3-TTT, and conditional handover schemes using paired multi-seed simulations with confidence intervals and statistical testing. Results show that OURS-RL-QTAB provides a favorable QoS–energy–signaling trade-off under the controlled simulation setting by reducing mean delay, 95th-percentile delay, packet loss, signaling load, and normalized energy cost per delivered Mbit while maintaining comparable throughput and utilization. Persistent-DAPS achieves the lowest jitter, but at substantially higher energy cost and much higher signaling load than the proposed talk-less controller. Sensitivity, generalization, and ablation analyses further confirm that the proposed performance is not dependent on a single parameter setting and that TTB prediction, talk-less operation, selective DAPS, queue-risk awareness, safety triggering, reinforcement learning action selection, and handover lockout each contribute to the final performance. Within the controlled single-UE 1-D boundary-crossing model, the results indicate a favorable overall QoS–energy–signaling trade-off for selective risk-aware DAPS activation with hybrid rule-constrained and RL-assisted control. Not applicable. This study does not involve clinical trials, human participants, or medical interventions and is based entirely on simulation and computational modeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: