This record contains the public preprint of the study "Incremental Evidence-Dependent Authorization for Software Delivery Pipelines: Design, Implementation, and Scaling Evaluation." The study presents an incremental evidence-dependent authorization mechanism for software-delivery pipelines that separates evidence support, capability eligibility, and held permissions; reevaluates only the affected dependency region after evidence loss; and requires an explicit restoration transition before recovered eligibility can become held authority again. The executable reproducibility artifact (Python reference implementation, synthetic scaling and conformance benchmark, runnable CI/CD-style pipeline trace, machine-readable results, deterministic logs, generated figures, and a SHA-256 manifest) is archived separately at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22882539. Under the declared positive witness-family rule class and synthetic workloads, the reported reference evaluation contains 3,300 incremental-versus-full oracle comparisons with zero state or permission mismatches and 10,000 restoration episodes with zero automatic or premature regrants. Timing measurements are environment-specific and are not claimed as universal performance results. This preprint is made public to provide a stable citation for the mechanism and its existing evaluation. It is the same research work currently under journal review; the public record does not imply journal acceptance or peer-review endorsement. The research was conducted independently by the author and does not represent official sponsorship, supervision, or endorsement by Georgetown University.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burak Oktenli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: