This study assessed the metabolic and enzymatic responses of winter wheat (cv. ‘Hondia’, ‘Tytanika’) and winter spelt (cv. ‘Rokosz’) to the endophytic biopreparation InnoEndop with biochar as a carrier. In vitro experiments optimized endophyte viability and growth promotion across biochar variants, identifying 6.67 × 10 4 cells mL⁻ 1 at 15–20 °C as optimal conditions. A 40-day greenhouse pot trial was then conducted using inoculated seeds. Plant responses were monitored through untargeted LC/Q-TOF–MS metabolomics, HPLC–PDA phenolic profiling (every 10 days), and PAL/POX enzymatic assays (every 5 days). Optimal inoculation improved seedling vigor. At Day 0, both cultivars shared exclusive induction of metabolites linked to redox regulation, hormonal signaling, and the phenylpropanoid pathway, including GSSG, L-tryptophan, allantoin, scopoletin, and 12-OPDA. Metabolomic responses differed between genotypes: 'Rokosz' showed a balanced distribution of up- and down-regulated features, whereas 'Hondia' showed greater non-polar feature induction (980 vs. 419 differential features). By Day 40, 'Hondia' exhibited late POX activation (1.5 U·min⁻ 1 ·g⁻ 1 ) and wax ester accumulation (palmityl palmitate 39.7-fold), while 'Rokosz' maintained a sustained PAL peak (11.81 IU·g⁻ 1 FW) and phenylpropanoid accumulation. InnoEndop induces genotype-specific metabolic strategies rather than uniform responses. Modern wheat employs progressive structural and biochemical defenses, whereas ancient spelt activates focused phenylpropanoid-based resistance. These findings highlight the importance of host-specific microbiome interactions for sustainable agriculture and crop resilience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pacan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: