Background Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) remains an important complication of central venous catheter use in children, particularly where antimicrobial resistance limits treatment options. We evaluated patient-level CLABSI risk, mortality-associated factors, bloodstream-isolate distribution, time to documented culture negativity, and multidrug resistance (MDR) in a mixed-ward pediatric cohort. Methods This retrospective, single-center cohort included hospitalized children younger than 18 years with central venous catheters at a tertiary pediatric referral hospital in Tehran, Iran, from 2021 to 2024. Modified Poisson regression estimated adjusted risk ratios for CLABSI. Among children with CLABSI, factors associated with in-hospital mortality were evaluated using Firth penalized logistic regression, and model performance was internally assessed using bootstrap validation. Organism distribution and antimicrobial-susceptibility analyses were conducted at the isolate level; primary MDR prevalence was estimated at the patient level. Results Among 723 eligible children, 182 (25.2%) had at least one CLABSI and 128 (17.7%) died in hospital. All-cause in-hospital mortality among children with CLABSI was 22.0%. Compared with the PICU/general ICU, CLABSI risk was higher in the cardiac ICU/open-heart ICU (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.00–1.82) and lower in transplant/oncology (aRR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37–0.88). Femoral catheter placement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.04; 95% CI, 1.37–6.82) and each halving of platelet count (aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.20–1.94) were associated with mortality. Klebsiella spp. and Staphylococcus epidermidis predominated. MDR was detected in 82.0% of assessable children. Time to documented culture negativity differed across organism groups ( P = 0.002). Conclusions At least one CLABSI occurred in 25.2% of eligible children with CVCs; all-cause in-hospital mortality among children with CLABSI was 22.0%, and MDR was detected in 82.0% of assessable children. Ward-specific surveillance, reliable central-line insertion and maintenance practices, regular review of line necessity, and locally informed antimicrobial stewardship are priorities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tabasizadeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: