Quasi-brittle fracture simulations often lose robustness when localized cracking triggers abrupt stress redistribution and snap-back. The Cracking Elements Method (CE) captures discontinuous cracking by introducing element-wise crack-opening variables and self-propagating cracked segments, allowing multiple cracks to initiate and propagate without remeshing, nodal enrichment, or explicit crack tracking. Its conventional formulation, however, follows a continuous nonlinear traction–separation path and requires Newton iterations or arc-length-type control in unstable post-peak regimes. This paper presents a sequential-linear reformulation of CE (CE-SLA). The original cracking-element kinematics, characteristic length, crack orientation rule, mixed-mode cohesive framework, and adaptive node-insertion strategy are retained, while cohesive softening is replaced by an event-driven sequence of linear reloading problems. New cracks and cohesive traction drops are both treated as admissible events. An energy-conserving zigzag traction–separation law makes cracked elements reload linearly and lose strength through local drop events, while load-to-strength and target-opening ratios locate the next event directly from a linear state. The accepted event history is retained as the computed force–displacement response. Dogbone, L-shaped panel and notched-beam benchmarks show that the proposed CE-SLA framework reproduces reasonable crack paths, raw event responses and snap-back behavior. In our tests, CE-SLA required 31.5%–73.2% of the linear solves and 29.1%–75.1% of the CPU time of the nonlinear CE, corresponding to CPU-time reductions of 24.9%–70.9%. CE-SLA therefore preserves the main advantages of CE while converting unstable cohesive fracture into a sequence of accepted linear fracture events without using Newton iterations to trace the continuous softening law.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: