Building on the reconstruction of the Clifford algebra basis in Ontology V8.3, this paper completes the following integration work:1.it gives the explicit mapping between the V8.3 dimensionless algebraic elements i,j,k and the Dirac algebra γ⁵,γ¹;2.it introduces the action-quantum generator axiom A1 and, through the dimensional upgrade ĵ=, gives an algebraic origin;3.it introduces the imaginary-time coordinate interface axiom A2, defines t̃=ict, explains that the imaginary-time coordinate has dimension of length $[L]$, and bridges to the action quantum through the Planck momentum: pPt̃P=i;4.it clarifies that V8.3 is a 3+1 dimensional Clifford algebra while the core formula of V8.2 uses only one spatial direction of it, so the core formula is a dimensional-reduction projection from the 3+1 dimensional algebra to 1+1 dimensions;5.it gives the complete reduction steps, the 1+1 dimensional Lorentz transformation, the time-quantization assumption, the back-solution for $dx$, and the substitution of the Planck time, finally obtaining the core formula dx=1-√1-v²/c²v√ G/c;6.it explains how A1, A2 and the reduction process connect with the physical assumptions of V8.2, and gives the complete 3+1 dimensional generalized form. This paper clearly distinguishes: $ict$ is an imaginary-time coordinate with dimension $[L]$; is an action quantum with dimension [ML²T⁻¹]; the two cannot be directly equated and must be bridged through momentum. This paper emphasizes: A1 and A2 are interface axioms, not theorems of V8.3; V8.3 alone cannot derive the core formula --- the core formula is a joint result of the V8.3 algebra, the V8.4 interface, and the V8.2 physical assumptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shuai Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: