Alzheimer’s Disease diagnosis requires integrating neuroimaging and clinical assessments. This study describes a multimodal framework for subject-level AD classification using sagittal MRI and clinical data from the OASIS-1 and OASIS-2 datasets. The framework uses MobileViT as a fixed feature extractor for MRI slices and a ClinicalMLPEncoder for clinical data. Subject-level SMOTE addresses class imbalance. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is used exclusively for labeling. Four fusion strategies (Intermediate, Cross-Attention, Early, and Late) are compared under subject-level 5-fold cross-validation with regularization, Focal Loss, and Automatic Mixed Precision. Cross-Attention fusion yields AUC of 0.941 on OASIS-1 and 0.903 on OASIS-2 for binary classification, with accuracies of 87.4% and 82.0%. ClinicalMLPEncoder outperforms TabNet. Error analysis indicates that misclassifications occur at the mildest disease stage (CDR = 0.5). Multi-class performance (3-class) produces AUCs of 0.907 and 0.833 on OASIS-1 and OASIS-2. MC-Dropout yields Brier scores of 0.135–0.145. External validation on the independent MIRIAD cohort yielded an AUC of 0.784 ± 0.038, with the standard deviation reflecting variability across five paired fold-ensembles. The Cross-Attention framework with ClinicalMLPEncoder provides a benchmark for multimodal AD diagnosis. Subject-level evaluation and CDR-as-label prevent leakage and provide performance estimates. Future work includes validation on ADNI and longitudinal analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otapo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: