Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To compare radiographic and computed tomography (CT) measurements of tracheal size as would be made for the purpose of tracheal stent size selection. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-over. ANIMALS: Dogs (n = 15). METHODS: Canine cadavers without evidence of tracheal or respiratory disease were used for CT and digital radiography of the neck and thorax. Three observers each made 3 independent measurements at each of 5 tracheal locations, and also measured tracheal length, on each radiograph and for each CT scan on each cadaver. RESULTS: CT tracheal measurements were on average 1.03 mm larger (P < .01) compared with radiographic measurements for all 3 observers. CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic measurements of the canine trachea consistently underestimate tracheal size, and CT measurements are preferable for selecting tracheal stent size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathews et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: