Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a methodology for critical gap analysis at signalized intersections with unprotected opposing left-turn movements. Highway capacity manual (HCM) methodology for estimating potential capacity uses base critical gap and base follow-up time, which are adjusted to reflect specific conditions of each intersection. That methodology assumes an unobstructed line-of-sight for drivers while executing left-turn maneuvers. However, the line-of-sight is not always unimpeded. Previous studies have shown that leading noncompact (larger and taller) vehicles and vehicles in the opposing left-turn lane may impede the line-of-sight. Specifically, the studies have demonstrated that the impedance may result in a capacity reduction. In order to quantify the capacity reduction, we present a methodology to modify the HCM critical gap and follow-up time model when the line-of-sight of unprotected left turn maneuver is obstructed. We introduce new adjustment factors to account for vehicles in the opposing left-turn lane obstructing the line-of-sight during the left-turn maneuver. Using field data from Baltimore and Annapolis, Maryland, we show that the obstruction increases the left-turn critical gap and the left-turn follow-up time, and hence decreases the potential capacity for left turns at intersections with unprotected left-turn movements. This capacity reduction may be a significant contributor to systemwide delay during rush hour, and may influence dilemma zone and red light running behavior, which are subjects of future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogallo et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: