Key result
Deep-learning ASL segmentation achieves ~0.91 Dice similarity to manual myocardial contouring.
Why the study?
Deep convolution neural networks have potential for automatic myocardial arterial spin labeled perfusion imaging segmentation, but methods to measure uncertainty and adapt false-positive versus false-negative tradeoffs are needed.
Does automatic myocardial ASL segmentation using deep CNN accurately measure myocardial blood flow compared to manual segmentation?
Does automatic myocardial ASL segmentation using deep CNN accurately measure myocardial blood flow compared to manual segmentation?
Deep convolutional neural networks can accurately perform automatic segmentation of myocardial arterial spin labeling, providing a reliable alternative to manual segmentation.
May accelerate myocardial ASL research workflows; leaves open clinical validation and outcome impact.
Purpose To apply deep convolution neural network to the segmentation task in myocardial arterial spin labeled perfusion imaging and to develop methods that measure uncertainty and that adapt the convolution neural network model to a specific false‐positive versus false‐negative tradeoff. Methods The Monte Carlo dropout U‐Net was trained on data from 22 subjects and tested on data from 6 heart transplant recipients. Manual segmentation and regional myocardial blood flow were available for comparison. We consider 2 global uncertainty measures, named “Dice uncertainty” and “Monte Carlo dropout uncertainty,” which were calculated with and without the use of manual segmentation, respectively. Tversky loss function with a hyperparameter β was used to adapt the model to a specific false‐positive versus false‐negative tradeoff. Results The Monte Carlo dropout U‐Net achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.91 ± 0.04 on the test set. Myocardial blood flow measured using automatic segmentations was highly correlated to that measured using the manual segmentation (R2 = 0.96). Dice uncertainty and Monte Carlo dropout uncertainty were in good agreement (R2 = 0.64). As β increased, the false‐positive rate systematically decreased and false‐negative rate systematically increased. Conclusion We demonstrate the feasibility of deep convolution neural network for automatic segmentation of myocardial arterial spin labeling, with good accuracy. We also introduce 2 simple methods for assessing model uncertainty. Finally, we demonstrate the ability to adapt the convolution neural network model to a specific false‐positive versus false‐negative tradeoff. These findings are directly relevant to automatic segmentation in quantitative cardiac MRI and are broadly applicable to automatic segmentation problems in diagnostic imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Do et al. (2019) studied Myocardial arterial spin labeled perfusion imaging (n=28). Monte Carlo dropout U-Net vs. Manual segmentation was evaluated on Dice coefficient on the test set. Automatic segmentation of myocardial arterial spin labeling using a Monte Carlo dropout U-Net achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.91 and highly correlated with manual segmentation (R2 = 0.96).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: