Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The yield during electrophoretic deposition is modeled incorporating the changing electric field over the suspension, due to a potential drop over the growing deposit, assessed from on‐line measurements of the current flowing through the deposition cell and the conductivity of the suspension during electrophoretic deposition. The kinetic model is validated for Al 2 O 3 suspensions with different powder loads based on methylethylketone with n ‐butylamine and ethanol with polyethyleneimine or HNO 3 , suspensions with, respectively, a constant and a decreasing electric field during deposition. The need for a powder concentration correction, even at volume fractions down to 0.03, and the incorporation of a changing electric field is experimentally proven to be essential in order to describe the deposition yield more accurately than predicted from the Hamaker equation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anné et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: