Key result
Global survey shows poor guideline adherence in PFO management, with only ~12% following antiplatelet duration.
Why the study?
There is variable adherence to current recommendations for diagnosis and management of patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO).
Cross-Sectional (n=79)
Yes
There is significant global variation and suboptimal adherence to guidelines in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke.
Suboptimal PFO guideline adherence warrants local audits and education; leaves open impact on recurrent stroke risk.
AIMS: The European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) Scientific Initiatives Committee performed a global survey to evaluate the current practice for the assessment and management of patients with suspected patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 79 imaging centres from 34 countries across the world responded to the survey, which comprised 17 questions. Most non-invasive investigations for PFO were widely available in the responding centres, with the exception of transcranial colour Doppler which was only available in 70% of sites, and most commonly performed by neurologists. Standard transthoracic echocardiography, with or without bubbles, was considered the first-level test for suspected PFO in the majority of the centres, whereas transoesophageal echocardiography was an excellent second-level modality. Most centres would rule out atrial fibrillation (AF) as a source of embolism in all patients with cryptogenic stroke (63%), with the remainder reserving investigation for patients with multiple AF risk factors (33%). Cardiac magnetic resonance was the preferred tool for identifying other unusual aetiologies, like cardiac masses or thrombi. After PFO closure, there was variation in the use of antiplatelet therapy: a quarter recommended treatment for life, while only 12% recommended 5 years as stipulated in the guidelines (12%). Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental or endoscopic procedures was not recommended in 41% of centres, contrary to what the guidelines recommended. CONCLUSION: Our survey revealed a variable adherence to the current recommendations for the diagnosis and management of patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO. Efforts should focus on optimizing and standardizing diagnostic tests and treatment of this condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Andrea et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke (n=79). Clinical practice for PFO and cryptogenic stroke management was evaluated on Survey responses on diagnostic and management practices. A global survey of 79 imaging centres revealed variable adherence to guidelines for managing PFO and cryptogenic stroke, with only 12% recommending the stipulated 5 years of antiplatelet therapy.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: