Key result
Catheter ablation achieves ~81% acute procedural success and reduces arrhythmia burden after atrial switch for d-TGA.
Why the study?
Patients with D-transposition of the great arteries and atrial switch have a high incidence of atrial arrhythmias, but detailed analysis of arrhythmia substrate, ablation strategies, and outcomes is lacking.
Cohort (n=36)
No
In patients with D-transposition of the great arteries and atrial switch, catheter ablation for atrial arrhythmias often requires complex transbaffle approaches and significantly reduces clinical arrhythmia burden despite a high recurrence rate.
May support ablation to reduce arrhythmia burden in D-TGA post-atrial switch; extends reports but remains hypothesis-generating.
Background: Patients with D-transposition of the great arteries and atrial switch have a high incidence of atrial arrhythmias. We sought to analyze the arrhythmia substrate, ablation strategies, and outcomes for catheter ablation in this population. Methods: An in-depth analysis of all clinical and procedural data in patients with D-transposition of the great arteries, atrial baffles, and atrial arrhythmia ablation was performed. Results: A cohort of 32 patients (72% male, mean age 38±7 years) underwent ablation for non-AV nodal reentrant tachycardia atrial arrhythmias, and 4 patients underwent AV nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation. Cavotricuspid isthmus flutter (CTI-flutter) was the most common arrhythmia, encountered in 75% of patients, followed by scar-related intraatrial reentrant tachycardia (non-CTI intraatrial reentrant tachycardia, 53%) and focal atrial tachycardia (focal atrial tachycardia, 6%). Among the 32 patients, 26 underwent 31 procedures at our institution. For patients with prior outside intervention, the index ablation at our institution revealed CTI-dependent flutter in 3/5 cases. However, redo ablation after an index ablation with demonstrated bidirectional CTI block revealed different/new arrhythmia substrates (80% non-CTI intraatrial reentrant tachycardia, 40% focal atrial tachycardia). Achieving bidirectional block across the CTI often required ablating on both sides of the baffle (retroaortic access, 81%; using a baffle leak, 11.5%; or transbaffle puncture, 7.7%). Combined approaches were necessary in 19% to reach the critical tissue. Acute procedural success was 81%, and recurrence was documented in 58% of patients. Despite recurrence, clinical arrhythmia burden was significantly reduced post-ablation ( P <0.001), with rare episodes, amenable to antiarrhythmic therapy. Redo ablation was required in 5 (19%) patients and uncovered new arrhythmia substrates. AV nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation also required transbaffle approaches in 3/4 patients. Conclusions: CTI-dependent flutter was the most common arrhythmia in patients with Dextro-Transposition of the Great Arteries and atrial switch. Transbaffle approaches were often necessary, and, provided that bidirectional CTI block was achieved at the index ablation, late recurrence was due to different arrhythmia mechanisms. Despite recurrence, ablation was associated with significant clinical improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiriac et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in D-transposition of the great arteries and atrial switch with atrial arrhythmias (n=36). Catheter ablation was evaluated on Acute procedural success. Catheter ablation in patients with D-transposition of the great arteries and atrial switch achieved 81% acute procedural success and significantly reduced clinical arrhythmia burden (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: