Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Six chlorophyll meters (SPAD) were compared to determine the magnitude of differences in SPAD readings on rice leaves. Correlations among the six SPAD meters were statistically significant (P<0.01) with correlation coefficients (r) ranging from 0.971 to 0.990. However, the differences in SPAD readings were statistically significant among the six meters (P<0.05) and the difference between two meters was as large as 2.7 units. Such magnitudes of discrepancy should be considered when different SPAD meters are used in the same study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: