Key result
Severe phantom shocks trigger profound psychological distress, prompting ICD deactivation and hospice transition.
Why the study?
Phantom shocks in ICD recipients create complex challenges due to their psychological distress and impact on patient well-being, with limited strategies for prediction and management.
Case Report (n=1)
Phantom shocks in ICD patients cause profound psychological distress requiring early recognition and multidisciplinary management including psychotherapy and antidepressants.
Phantom shocks may warrant integrated psychological screening in ICD follow-up; leaves open optimal management strategies pending prospective trials.
Phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients create a complex nexus between cardiac treatment and psychological distress. These sensations, mimicking therapeutic shocks without device activation, deeply affect patients' functionality and well-being. Heightened anxiety, depression, and hopelessness predispose individuals to these occurrences, posing significant challenges. This article delves into the intricate nature of phantom shocks, highlighting subtle clinical cues to differentiate them from genuine therapy shocks. Through a case study of a 75-year-old male with recurrent ICD shocks, diagnosed eventually with phantom shocks, the interplay between psychological distress and physical sensations is underscored. Urgent intervention to address the patient's anxiety and depression using psychotherapy and antidepressants became imperative. The case underscores the immense psychological toll of phantom shocks, exacerbating fear, hopelessness, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite treatment attempts, their impact persisted, leading to a shift to comfort-focused care. While research identifies factors such as education levels and prior therapy, predicting and managing phantom shocks remains challenging. This article stresses the need for clinician vigilance, urging proactive identification and tailored interventions to mitigate the profound effects of phantom shocks. The current research landscape lacks comprehensive strategies, necessitating further exploration and targeted therapies to restore patient well-being. In conclusion, comprehensive understanding and specialized care for phantom shocks in ICD recipients, addressing both cardiac and psychological aspects, are imperative. Early recognition and tailored interventions offer promise in alleviating their adverse effects, reinstating patient control, and improving their quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galo et al. (2024) conducted a case report in Phantom shocks in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) recipients (n=1). Phantom shocks was evaluated. Phantom shocks in a 75-year-old male with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator caused profound psychological distress, ultimately leading to device deactivation and transition to hospice care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: