Key result
Black women with SLE show no significant increase in maternal cardiovascular events vs White women.
Why the study?
Differences in maternal cardiovascular events and adverse pregnancy outcomes by race/ethnicity among pregnant individuals with SLE were not well characterised.
Do maternal cardiovascular events and adverse pregnancy outcomes differ across racial/ethnic groups among pregnant individuals with SLE?
Cohort (n=8,188)
Yes
Do maternal cardiovascular events and adverse pregnancy outcomes differ across racial/ethnic groups among pregnant individuals with SLE?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-Hispanic black women with SLE experience a disproportionately higher burden of maternal cardiovascular events and adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to non-Hispanic white women.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterise differences in the occurrence of maternal cardiovascular events (CVEs) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) in each of four racial/ethnic groups compared with non-Hispanic white women with SLE and to evaluate whether the relationship between CVEs and APOs differed across or within racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: Using a California population-based birth cohort (2005-2020), we identified pregnant individuals with SLE via International Classification of Diseases codes from maternal discharge records. Self-reported racial/ethnic groups were categorised as Asian, Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic white and other. Individuals with reported race or ethnicity as 'unknown' or 'not stated' were excluded from the study. Log-linear regression estimated adjusted relative risks (aRRs) of CVEs and APOs in each racial/ethnic group compared with non-Hispanic white individuals, adjusting for a propensity score derived from maternal age, payer, education, comorbidities and SLE-related variables. We performed CVE-stratified analyses for racial/ethnic differences in APOs and examined associations between CVEs and APOs within each racial/ethnic group. RESULTS: Among 8188 liveborn singletons from women with SLE, non-Hispanic black women had the highest prevalence of maternal CVEs (4.0% vs 1.6-2.0% in other groups), maternal APOs (24.6% vs 13.5-17.2%) and infant APOs (54.6% vs 34.6-49.4%). Relative to non-Hispanic white women, non-Hispanic black women had an aRR of 1.6 (95% CI 0.9 to 2.6) for maternal CVEs and 1.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.6) for maternal APOs, whereas infant APO risks were significantly higher across three of four racial/ethnic groups compared with non-Hispanic white women. CONCLUSIONS: Non-Hispanic black women exhibited the highest absolute burden for the adverse outcomes studied. Relative to non-Hispanic white individuals, elevated adjusted risks based on race/ethnicity were most consistent for infant APOs, whereas elevated risks for maternal APOs and CVEs were found primarily among non-Hispanic black individuals. Social drivers of health need consideration while caring for pregnant individuals with SLE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhital et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in pregnancy (n=8,188). Non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity vs. Non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity was evaluated on Maternal cardiovascular events (CVEs) (aRR 1.6, 95% CI 0.9-2.6). Compared with non-Hispanic white women with SLE, non-Hispanic black women had a higher prevalence of maternal cardiovascular events (4.0%) and an adjusted relative risk of 1.6 (95% CI 0.9-2.6).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: