Key result
Cilostazol increases maximum walking distance by ~52 meters vs placebo in intermittent claudication.
Why the study?
The effectiveness and safety of cilostazol, beraprost sodium, and prostaglandin E1 for treating intermittent claudication were uncertain and required systematic evaluation.
Do cilostazol, beraprost sodium, or prostaglandin E1 improve walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,131)
Do cilostazol, beraprost sodium, or prostaglandin E1 improve walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication?
Cilostazol and prostaglandin E1 significantly improve maximum and pain-free walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication compared to placebo, whereas beraprost sodium does not show significant benefit.
Supports cilostazol and PGE1 for IC walking gains; extends evidence but leaves beraprost efficacy open.
To study the effectiveness for the treatment of intermittent claudication (IC) of three drugs with antiplatelet effects, cilostazol, beraprost sodium, and prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)), by using a systemic review of literature and a meta-analysis. A search was undertaken for studies reported between 1966-2002 in the MEDLINE database, and references in published articles and reviews were obtained. Data for maximum walking distance (MWD), pain-free walking distance (PFWD), and adverse clinical events were extracted from the articles that met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates of the weighted mean differences (WMD) of MWD and PFWD for cilostazol were 52.19 m [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.08, 72.31] and 39.75 m [95% CI 23.39, 56.10], and those for PGE(1) were 100.27 m [95% CI 15.76, 184.78] and 55.73 [95% CI 21.54, 89.92], respectively. These differences were statistically significant between the test drugs and placebo. However there was no statistical significance difference between beraprost sodium and placebo, even though there was one study that showed a tendency for improvement in walking distance. The total rate of adverse clinical events in cilostazol and beraprost sodium was higher than that for placebo, while there was no statistical significant difference between PGE(1) and placebo, although PGE(1) had a higher tendency for adverse clinical events. The literature evaluation results and the meta-analysis suggest that these two drugs (cilostazol and PGE(1)) can be considered to be effective drugs for the treatment of IC. Due to current availability of only a few clinical reports, further studies are needed to clarify the efficacy of beraprost sodium in the treatment of IC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashiguchi et al. (2004) conducted a meta-analysis in Intermittent claudication (n=2,131). Cilostazol, Beraprost sodium, and Prostaglandin E1 vs. Placebo was evaluated on Maximum walking distance (MWD) for cilostazol (WMD 52.19 m, 95% CI 32.08, 72.31, p=<0.05). Cilostazol and prostaglandin E1 significantly increased maximum walking distance compared to placebo in patients with intermittent claudication, with cilostazol showing a pooled weighted mean difference of 52.19 meters.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: