The comparison of residual Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) with traditional MFL method was carried out as applied to rail nondestructive testing. The mechanisms for the residual magnetization of rails are considered. It is concluded that the traditional Magnetic Flux Leakage method is more effective as compared with one based on а rail remanence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antipov et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: