From high‐precision MOST photometry spanning 35 days the existence of two spots rotating with slightly differing periods is confirmed. From the marginal probability distribution of the derived differential rotation parameter k its expectation value as well as confidence limits are computed directly from the data. The result depends on the assumed range in inclination i, not on the shape of the prior distributions. Two cases have been considered: (a) The priors for angles, inclination i of the star and spot latitudes β 1,2, are assumed to be constant over i, β 1, and β 2; (b) the priors are assumed to be constant over cos i, sin β 1, and sin β 2. In both cases the full range of inclination is considered: 0° ≤ i ≤ 90°. Scalefree parameters, i. e. periods and spot areas (in case of small spots) are taken logarithmically. Irrespective of the shape of the prior, k is restricted to 0.03 ≤ k ≤ 0.10 (1 σ limits). The inclination i of the star is photometrically ill‐defined. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2007 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: