Key result
Baseline PET-derived CFR fails to predict incident coronary artery calcification at 11 years in young men.
Why the study?
It was uncertain whether reduced coronary flow reserve in healthy young men predicts coronary artery calcification after long-term follow-up.
Does coronary flow reserve assessed by PET predict the development of coronary calcifications in healthy young men?
Cohort (n=77)
Does coronary flow reserve assessed by PET predict the development of coronary calcifications in healthy young men?
p-value: p=0.4
Coronary flow reserve measured by PET does not predict the development of coronary calcification over 11 years in healthy, asymptomatic young men.
PET coronary flow reserve should not guide calcification risk assessment in healthy young men; leaves open its prognostic value for events or in other groups.
AIMS: We studied whether a reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR) in healthy young men independently predicts the presence of coronary artery disease as assessed by coronary artery calcification after 11 years of follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary microvascular dysfunction in early stages of coronary artery disease can be detected as a reduced CFR by positron emission tomography (PET). Seventy-seven healthy, lean, normotensive, non-smoking and non-diabetic men underwent 15-Oxygen ((15)O) water myocardial perfusion PET at rest and during vasodilator stress at the age of 35 ± 4 years at baseline. The subjects were followed-up for 11 ± 1 years and the coronary artery calcium score (CCS) was measured with computed tomography at the end of the follow-up. At the end of the follow-up, 30 (39%) individuals had CCS >0 (average 65 ± 93), but none had clinical symptoms or evidence of ischaemia in stress echocardiography. At baseline, the average CFR was comparable in individuals with CCS >0 and CCS = 0 (4.2 ± 1.4 vs. 4.0 ± 1.2, P = 0.4). Logistic regression analysis showed no associations between CFR, serum glucose, cholesterol levels, systolic blood pressure or body mass index at baseline and CCS at the end of the follow-up (P always >0.05). The presence of CCS (CCS >0) was associated with higher systolic and diastolic blood pressures at the end of the follow-up (137 ± 18 vs. 128 ± 11 mmHg, P = 0.04 and 86 ± 12 vs. 78 ± 11 mmHg, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary reactivity to vasodilator-induced hyperaemia as assessed by perfusion PET was not predictive of the presence of coronary calcification after 11 years of follow-up in asymptomatic men with very low likelihood of coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uusitalo et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery calcification (n=77). Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was evaluated on Presence of coronary artery calcification (CCS > 0) (p=0.4). Baseline coronary flow reserve assessed by PET was not predictive of the development of coronary calcification after 11 years of follow-up in healthy young men (P=0.4).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: