Key result
Lower agreeableness and conscientiousness significantly exacerbated the association between type 2 diabetes polygenic risk and HbA1c levels (interaction β=-0.08, p=0.021 for agreeableness).
Why the study?
Do personality traits moderate the association between type 2 diabetes polygenic risk and HbA1c levels in community-dwelling adults?
Observational (n=837)
Do personality traits moderate the association between type 2 diabetes polygenic risk and HbA1c levels in community-dwelling adults?
Effect estimate: β=-0.08
p-value: p=0.021
Personality traits such as agreeableness and conscientiousness may moderate the expression of genetic risk for type 2 diabetes, as measured by HbA1c levels.
May indicate personality moderation of T2D genetic risk on HbA1c; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether personality traits moderate type 2 diabetes (T2D) genetic risk. METHODS: Using a large community-dwelling sample (n=837, Mage=69.59±0.85years, 49% males) we fitted a series of linear regression models predicting glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from T2D polygenic risk - aggregation of small individual effects of a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) - and five personality traits. We tested the main effects of personality traits and their interactions with T2D polygenic risk score, controlling for age and sex. The models in the final set were adjusted for cognitive ability, highest educational qualification, and occupational class. RESULTS: Lower levels of openness were associated with heightened levels of HbA1c (β=-0.014, p=.032). There was a significant interaction between T2D polygenic risk score and agreeableness: lower agreeableness was related to a stronger association between T2D polygenic risk and HbA1c (β=-0.08, p=.021). In the model adjusted for cognitive ability, the main effect of openness was not significant (β=-0.08, p=.057). The interaction between agreeableness and T2D polygenic risk was still present after controlling for cognitive ability and socioeconomic status indicators, and the interaction between conscientiousness and polygenic risk score was also significant: lower conscientiousness was associated with a stronger association between T2D polygenic risk and HbA1c levels (β=0.09, p=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Personality may be associated with markers of diabetes, and may moderate the expression of its genetic risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Čukić et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes genetic risk (n=837). Personality traits and T2D polygenic risk score was evaluated on Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (β=-0.08, p=0.021). Lower agreeableness and conscientiousness significantly exacerbated the association between type 2 diabetes polygenic risk and HbA1c levels (interaction β=-0.08, p=0.021 for agreeableness).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: