Key result
Novel anterior trans-iliopsoas and posterior gluteal approaches successfully treat persistent iliac aneurysm endoleaks.
Why the study?
Endoleaks after internal iliac artery aneurysm repair can cause sac growth and rupture, and accessing involved arteries for embolization is technically challenging.
Case Report
Provides technical options for accessing and embolizing challenging endoleaks following internal iliac artery aneurysm repair.
Alternative routes may aid embolization of inaccessible iliac endoleaks; leaves open safety and reproducibility in larger series.
Internal iliac artery aneurysms (IIAAs), isolated or associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms, are at rupture risk with growth. Treatment is recommended when symptomatic or greater than 3 cm. Surgical or endovascular therapy should exclude the arterial origin and outflow branches. If all outflow branches are not completely embolized, an endoleak can develop, pressurizing the sac leading to growth and rupture. Accessing the arteries involved can be technically challenging and understanding potential targets is critical. We describe two percutaneous approaches for treatment: percutaneously accessing the sac from an anterior trans-iliopsoas approach and percutaneously accessing the gluteal artery from a posterior approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2021) conducted a case report in Internal iliac artery aneurysms with endoleak. Percutaneous embolization approaches (anterior trans-iliopsoas or posterior gluteal) was evaluated. Two percutaneous approaches (anterior trans-iliopsoas access to the sac and posterior access to the gluteal artery) are described for treating endoleaks after iliac artery aneurysm repair.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: