Key result
Ivabradine matches beta-blockers and calcium antagonists for antianginal efficacy in stable angina.
Why the study?
Ivabradine is a novel selective and specific I(f) current inhibitor providing heart rate reduction without affecting myocardial contractility or coronary resistance, with clinical efficacy and tolerability in stable angina needing clarification.
Does ivabradine improve antianginal efficacy and tolerability in patients with stable angina?
Does ivabradine improve antianginal efficacy and tolerability in patients with stable angina?
Ivabradine offers an effective and well-tolerated alternative for the treatment of stable angina, particularly for patients with contraindications or intolerance to beta-blockers.
Ivabradine is the first selective and specific inhibitor of the I(f) current (the cardiac pacemaker 'funny' current), and provides pure heart rate reduction without altering myocardial contractility, the cardiac conduction system or coronary vascular resistance. Clinical proof of the antianginal efficacy and tolerability of ivabradine comes from the largest clinical development programme that has ever been performed in stable angina, involving more than 5000 patients. Ivabradine was shown to be as effective as well-established reference antianginal drugs, such as beta-blockers and calcium antagonists. It is well tolerated and is free of the most commonly observed side effects of currently prescribed antianginal drugs. It offers clear therapeutic benefits for a whole range of patients with stable angina, including those with contraindications or intolerance to beta-blockers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim Fox (2006) conducted a review in stable angina (n=5,000). Ivabradine vs. beta-blockers and calcium antagonists was evaluated. Ivabradine demonstrated antianginal efficacy comparable to beta-blockers and calcium antagonists in a clinical development program of over 5000 patients with stable angina.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: