BACKGROUND: More than 3.6 million children are served daily by the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)-participating child day care centers. This study provides a nationwide assessment of center-level responsibilities for menu, meal/snack preparation, meal preparer training, and food and beverage (F&B) purchasing. METHODS: A nationally representative survey of 5483 CACFP child day care centers was conducted between August 22, 2017, and September 30, 2017. One thousand three hundred forty-three centers (25% response) in 47 states and the District of Columbia responded. Descriptive statistics describe center-level menu, meal, and purchasing practices and center characteristics. Multivariate logistic regressions examined characteristics associated with F&B purchasing sources. RESULTS: Menus were primarily prepared by directors/assistant directors and on-site food manager/cooks, while site staff primarily prepared meals/snacks. Fifty-two percent of meal preparers held a food sanitation license, but only 5% had formal nutrition training (e.g., Registered Dietician). Most centers purchased F&B from food service providers (63%), local grocery stores (59%), warehouse stores (40%), or from 2+ sources (50%). Independent centers were more likely to purchase F&B from local grocery stores or 2+, while free or state-subsidized sites were more likely to purchase from a food service provider and less likely to purchase from other sources than were centers charging between $101 and $201.99 per week. Centers where an on-site cook/food manager prepared the menus were significantly more likely to purchase their F&B from local grocery and/or warehouse stores and/or from 2+ sources. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist to target CACFP training to specific roles within and specific types of CACFP-participating child day care centers to facilitate compliance with the updated CACFP standards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chriqui et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: