Why the study?
The mechanisms and clinical implications of pulmonary vein bigeminy during sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation patients remain unclear.
Does pulmonary vein bigeminy indicate arrhythmogenic triggers of atrial fibrillation and influence clinical outcomes after PVI?
Observational (n=465)
Does pulmonary vein bigeminy indicate arrhythmogenic triggers of atrial fibrillation and influence clinical outcomes after PVI?
Pulmonary vein bigeminy is a rare but strong indicator of arrhythmogenic veins triggering AF, and its presence is associated with excellent clinical outcomes after PVI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PV bigeminy may mark highly arrhythmogenic veins; leaves open whether targeted isolation improves outcomes beyond standard PVI.
Background The pulmonary veins (PVs) have unique electrophysiological properties triggering and maintaining atrial fibrillation (AF). Bigeminal PV electrical activity (PV bigeminy) during sinus rhythm has been reported; however, its mechanisms and clinical implication remain unclear. We hypothesized that PV bigeminy indicates arrhythmogenic activities and influences clinical outcome. Methods and Results We retrospectively analyzed electrophysiological studies in 465 patients with AF who underwent first session PV isolation (PVI). PV bigeminy was observed in 30 PVs of 23 patients (4.9% of patients). PV bigeminy was observed in left inferior PV (LIPV) in 15 patients, which was the most prevalent, followed by left superior in seven and right superior in seven and right inferior in one. In response to atrial extra stimulus, the second PV potentials (PV2) showed decremental conduction properties, suggesting reentrant mechanisms involved (n = 5). Interestingly, AF was initiated from the 23 PVs with bigeminy in 21 patients (76.7% of 30 PVs with bigeminy), spontaneously or in response to drugs, which was significantly more prevalent from the AF initiation rate from each PV in the control 442 patients (182 firings in 1290 PVs, 14.1%, P < .0001). PVI‐based ablation was completed in the 23 patients with PV bigeminy and no recurrence was observed during 1‐year follow‐up, whereas four patients needed second sessions. Conclusions PV bigeminy is relatively rare but a unique electrophysiological finding in AF patients, suggesting reentrant substrate within the PV and/or surrounding tissue. PV bigeminy is a strong indicator of arrhythmogenic vein triggering AF, and ensures an excellent clinical outcome after PVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mukai et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=465). Pulmonary vein bigeminy vs. Pulmonary veins without bigeminy was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation initiation from the pulmonary vein (p=<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: