Indoor localization has emerged as a critical enabler for next-generation location-based services and the evolving 6G ecosystem, particularly where satellite localization is unavailable. Among indoor technologies, Wi-Fi fingerprinting offers an attractive trade-off between deployment cost, infrastructure availability, and localization accuracy. Recent advances in IEEE 802.11mc have enabled the use of round-trip time (RTT) measurements, providing more stable and accurate observables than received signal strength (RSS). However, RTT fingerprinting still suffers from two major limitations: high overhead from exhaustive site surveys and the difficulty of maintaining dense radio maps in dynamic environments. This paper proposes a Wi-Fi RTT fingerprinting framework that minimizes offline calibration effort by restricting empirical measurements to a sparse set of reference locations associated with deployed access points (APs). A Gaussian Process Regression (GPR)-based reconstruction model synthetically generates dense virtual reference point fingerprints, while physical-signal fitting models improve RTT estimation during reconstruction. Unlike previous studies focused on RTT/RSS fusion, ranging compensation, or generic interpolation, this work systematically investigates GPR-based synthetic radio map reconstruction for Wi-Fi RTT fingerprinting, evaluating the impact of AP geometry, grid density, temporal averaging, and reconstruction models on localization performance. Experimental results from real-world RTT measurements show that the framework maintains sub-meter localization accuracy in deployments where the target area lies within the convex hull of the APs. Conversely, the observed RMSE is approximately 2 m in asymmetric extrapolation scenarios. Nonetheless, it significantly reduces the calibration complexity and signaling overhead associated with dense RTT fingerprint collection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin‐Escalona et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: