Key result
Therapeutic aPTT during heparin for NSTEMI shows no association with 30-day mortality.
Why the study?
Data on time in therapeutic range (TTR) during unfractionated heparin therapy in NSTEMI are scarce and its clinical significance is unclear.
Does achieving therapeutic aPTT range during unfractionated heparin therapy reduce mortality or complications in patients with NSTEMI?
Cohort (n=1,553)
No
Does achieving therapeutic aPTT range during unfractionated heparin therapy reduce mortality or complications in patients with NSTEMI?
Odds Ratio: 1.3 (95% CI 0.7–2.4)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.6% vs 4%
p-value: p=0.614
In patients with NSTEMI undergoing an early invasive strategy, achieving therapeutic aPTT range with unfractionated heparin is infrequent and not associated with improved clinical outcomes.
BackgroundUnfractionated heparin (UFH) is widely used in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), but its narrow therapeutic window requires frequent activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) monitoring. Data on time in therapeutic range (TTR) in this setting are scarce.MethodsWe analyzed 1,553 consecutive patients with NSTEMI treated with UFH in a tertiary care intensive cardiovascular care unit between July 2019 and December 2025. TTR was calculated by linear interpolation over 72 hours. Associations with complications and 30-day and 1-year mortality were assessed.ResultsAmong them (mean age 67.1 ± 13.8 years, 73.9% male), only 325 (20.9%) reached the therapeutic range. Mean TTR was 12.5 ± 20.2%. An early invasive strategy predominated: 85.5% underwent coronary angiography, approximately 89% of them within 24 hours (mean time to angiography 14.4 ± 10.1 hours). Therapeutic-range attainment was not associated with mortality at 30 days (4.6% vs 4.0%, p=0.614) or 1 year (8.6% vs 9.3%, p=0.710), even after multivariable adjustment (adjusted OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.70-2.40 and 0.98, 95% CI 0.62-1.55, respectively). It was also not associated with in-hospital complications, including re-infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, or bleeding.ConclusionsTherapeutic aPTT was achieved infrequently, and neither therapeutic-range attainment nor TTR was associated with clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that, using a contemporary approach to NSTEMI with a short time to angiography in the great majority of cases, TTR does not represent an optimal marker of anticoagulation quality, warranting evaluation of alternative strategies. Given the low event rate, confirmation in larger, adequately powered studies is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golani et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) (n=1,553). Therapeutic-range aPTT attainment vs. Subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic aPTT was evaluated on 30-day mortality (adjusted OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.70-2.40, p=0.614). Attaining therapeutic aPTT range during unfractionated heparin therapy for NSTEMI was not associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.70-2.40; p=0.614).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: