Key result
Higher Relative Fat Mass is linked to ~84% higher odds of adverse blood-pressure categories.
Why the study?
The comparative screening performance of conventional and emerging anthropometric indices for identifying blood pressure and random capillary glucose categories among semi-urban Nigerian adults was unclear.
Do conventional and emerging anthropometric indices accurately discriminate elevated blood pressure and random capillary glucose categories in semi-urban Nigerian adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=6,027)
Yes
Do conventional and emerging anthropometric indices accurately discriminate elevated blood pressure and random capillary glucose categories in semi-urban Nigerian adults?
Anthropometric indices provide only modest discrimination for hypertensive-range blood pressure and poor discrimination for elevated random capillary glucose, suggesting they should complement rather than replace direct clinical measurements.
Anthropometric indices show limited screening utility in Nigerian adults; leaves open their incremental value beyond direct measurements in African cohorts.
To compare the screening performance of conventional and emerging anthropometric indices for identifying blood-pressure and exploratory random capillary glucose categories among semi-urban Nigerian adults. This cross-sectional analysis included 6,027 adults attending outreach programmes in Northcentral Nigeria between 2019 and 2023. Eight indices were evaluated: body mass index, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio, Conicity Index, Relative Fat Mass (RFM), A Body Shape Index, Body Roundness Index and Weight-Adjusted Waist Index. Blood pressure was classified using 2024 European Society of Cardiology thresholds. Single non-fasting capillary glucose measurements were analysed continuously and in exploratory, non-diagnostic categories. Analyses used age- and sex-adjusted ordinal logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves. Mean age was 49.0 (SD 15.9) years; 75.8% were female. Elevated and hypertensive-range blood pressure occurred in 55.9% and 42.1%, respectively; 6.6% had glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L. All indices were associated with both outcomes; RFM showed the strongest adjusted associations. WC had the highest observed AUC for hypertensive-range blood pressure (0.633), and Conicity Index for glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L (0.578). Discrimination was modest for blood pressure and poor for glucose. Anthropometric measures should complement direct blood-pressure measurement and confirmatory glycaemic testing. Female predominance limits generalisability, particularly to men. Exploratory thresholds require validation in representative populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bello-Ovosi et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Elevated blood pressure and dysglycaemia (n=6,027). Anthropometric indices (e.g., BMI, waist circumference, relative fat mass) was evaluated on Association of Relative Fat Mass (per 1-SD increase) with ordered blood-pressure categories (aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.68-2.01, p=<0.001). Relative Fat Mass showed the strongest adjusted association with blood-pressure categories (aOR 1.84), while waist circumference had the highest discriminatory performance for hypertensive-range blood pressure (AUC 0.633).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: