On a popular and influential view, normative reasons are premises in good reasoning, where good reasoning manifests a pattern of reasoning that normally preserves fittingness. I develop two counterexamples to this view: isolated *pro tanto* reasons that are either weak or normally overridden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akshan deAlwis (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: