Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Solar drying can reduce dependence on conventional fossil-fuel-based thermal energy, but solar collector efficiency strongly influences performance. This study investigates whether modifying the absorber surface with silicon nanoparticles can improve the thermal performance of a FPSC and enhance agricultural drying. The study combines silicon-nanoparticle absorber modification, surface characterization, controlled air mass-flow optimization, and practical drying validation to evaluate the relationship between absorber characteristics, collector performance, and drying behavior. We prepared and compared three absorber coatings: BP, BP-3 wt% G, and BP-5 wt% Si. We conducted experiments at air mass flow rates of 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 kg.s −1 and evaluated absorber temperature, solar irradiance, collector efficiency, and drying performance. SEM/EDS analysis confirmed the incorporation and distribution of silicon nanoparticles within the coating. The BP-Si coating achieved a maximum thermal efficiency of 25.8%, an improvement of 7.6 percentage points (41.8% relative improvement) over the conventional BP coating's 18.2% efficiency under the same operating conditions. The corresponding maximum absorber temperature reached approximately 125 °C. In the drying validation experiment, apple moisture content decreased from approximately 87% to 8%, with the BP-Si system achieving the target moisture in 23 h, compared with 30 h for BP-G and 33 h for BP. Statistical analysis showed that absorber coating composition, air mass flow rate and their interaction significantly affected collector thermal efficiency ( p < 0.01). Overall, the results demonstrate that silicon-nanoparticle modification of a conventional absorber can enhance collector thermal performance and reduce time without requiring complex collector modifications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ullah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: