Dynamic Near-Field Fresnel Delay Tracking for Weak Cyclostationary Signal Detection in Long-Baseline Interferometry Reference implementation and reproducibility package for the accompanying technical note(paper/main.tex, version 2). Evaluates three beamforming/delay-tracking regimes — Dynamic Fraunhofer,Static Fresnel, and Dynamic Fresnel — on an idealized 27-element VLA-A ("Y") array observinga synthetic DSSS/BPSK source at cislunar distance (R0 = 384,400 km, f_RF = 1.4 GHz), andreproduces Tables 1-4 of the paper. The badge above is the concept DOI, which always resolves to the latest version. Version 1 isarchived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22993273. Requirements pip install -r requirements.txt Requires only NumPy (see requirements.txt). Reproducing the results cd src python run_monte_carlo.py # Tables 1-2: three regimes, 5 seeds, SNR = -20 and -25 dB python sensitivity_analysis.py # Tables 3-4: tolerance to range, pointing and chirp-rate mismatch run_monte_carlo.py prints the time-averaged beam coherence of each regime and, per seed, the detectedcyclic frequency and spectral prominence. The expected cyclic harmonic is alpha = 2*f_IF = 400.0 Hz;only the Dynamic Fresnel regime recovers it (10 of 10 runs across both SNR levels). Expected output (SNR = -20.0 dB, first two seeds): Coherence Fraunhofer Dynamic: 0.2437 (-12.26 dB) Coherence Fresnel Static: 0.1959 (-14.16 dB) Coherence Fresnel Dynamic: 1.0000 (0.00 dB) Seed 0: Fraun=[ 1966.0 Hz, 6.18 dB] | FresnStat=[ 18.5 Hz, 5.75 dB] | FresnDyn=[ 400.0 Hz, 13.65 dB] Seed 1: Fraun=[ 738.5 Hz, 5.30 dB] | FresnStat=[ 1917.5 Hz, 5.52 dB] | FresnDyn=[ 400.0 Hz, 13.55 dB] sensitivity_analysis.py perturbs one parameter at a time around the nominal configuration. Its chirp-ratetable reports both the unpadded FFT (which shows scalloping loss) and an 8x zero-padded FFT (intrinsic loss). Repository structure ├── README.md ├── LICENSE ├── CITATION.cff ├── requirements.txt ├── paper/ │ └── main.tex <- manuscript (LaTeX source, version 2) └── src/ ├── vla_geometry.py <- 27-antenna VLA-A 'Y' array generator (power-law spacing) ├── delay_engine.py <- line-of-sight vector and Fraunhofer/Fresnel delay tensor ├── run_monte_carlo.py <- signal generation, three beamforming regimes, detector, Monte Carlo driver └── sensitivity_analysis.py <- range / pointing / chirp-rate mismatch study Scope and assumptions The simulations use oracle steering: the true pointing, range and chirp rate are given to the beamformer.sensitivity_analysis.py quantifies how much mismatch each parameter tolerates (pointing to about 0.5 arcsec is thebinding constraint; range errors of order 10^4 km are nearly harmless). The per-antenna SNR values (-20 and -25 dB) are stress-test parameters, not a link-budget estimate for a specific transmitter. Not modeled: ADC quantization, local-oscillator phase jitter, ionospheric/tropospheric effects, wideband(true-time-delay) operation. These are listed as future work in the paper. Citation See CITATION.cff or use the DOI above.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hugo Ricardo Rosales González (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: