Background/Objectives: Performance in track cycling depends on efficiently generating and applying force, with kinetic variables like force, torque, and power being critical. Although force-related qualities are more trainable for sprint power, research in track cycling is limited, especially in women, restricting equity and application. This study aimed to describe strength-related parameters and assessment methods in female track cyclists. Methods: A systematized review following PRISMA 2020 was conducted. Databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Dialnet, Scielo) were searched from 1 January 2016, to 16 April 2025. Inclusion criteria: primary studies on female track cyclists assessing kinetic strength variables. Exclusions: studies with Paralympic-classified disabilities or without sex-specific results. Data on power, force, torque, protocols, and participants were extracted; quality was assessed using the Downs and Black scale. Registered in INPLASY (INPLASY202550092). Results: From 6391 records, 3514 duplicates were removed, and 2877 were analyzed to eligibility criteria; 4 studies (n = 32 athletes) were included. All reported power; three reported torque (n = 25), one reported force (n = 6), and one reported rate of force development (n = 6). Assessments used cycle ergometers (n = 3), a bicycle with a potentiometer (n = 1), and a force platform (n = 1). Conclusions: Power and torque are the most studied kinetic variables in female track cycling. Evidence shows substantial methodological heterogeneity and a scarcity of studies in women, highlighting the need for standardized protocols and increased research in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aedo–Muñoz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: